Nancy Pelosi and the World United Formosans for Independence – WUFI (臺灣獨立建國聯盟)

In July of 1971, US President Nixon announced that he would be visiting the People’s Republic of China the following year. The relationship between the US and China was in the forefront of the news cycle where journalists were discussing the relationship of the US and the People’s Republic of China (China) vs the US and the Republic of China (Taiwan). Throughout all these discussions, Taiwan was never mentioned in the news. It was always a discussion between communist China and “free” China.

The World United Formosans for Independence was just formed earlier that year and they decided it was an important opportunity to educate US citizens that Taiwan was not China. In 1971, they organized a rally at the steps of the Lincoln monument where over a thousand WUFI members came from all over North America to push the cause for Taiwan independence from both the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China.

At the time, Strong C Chuang (莊秋雄) sat on the central committee of WUFI with the role of spreading the ideology of Taiwan independence.

Taiwanese Americans from Cincinnati, Ohio made this banner for this demonstration. There were 7 people that held the banner, where the first six people held T – A – I – W – A – N and the last one held this banner for Independence.

Dr David Tsai (蔡武雄) introduced a young congressional aide to Strong Chuang telling him that she was the daughter of the mayor of Baltimore, MD (Thomas D’Alesandro ). This young congressional aid was none other than Nancy Pelosi. In 1971, she was slowly working her way up the Democratic party ranks. That day, she observed the passion and righteousness of these WUFI members in front of the Lincoln monument and had discussions about 228, white terror and the aspiration of the Taiwanese people to have their own sovereign independent nation state.

Now, in 2022, when Speaker Pelosi visited Taiwan, she made a special point to visit the National Human Rights Museum. (https://www.nhrm.gov.tw/w/nhrm/index) In doing so, it shows that she remembers the stories those early Taiwan independence activists shared with her about white terror and the cost Taiwanese people paid for their freedom and democracy.

Standard

Dr. Grace Chou challenged the blacklist with Dr Strong Chuang

https://winchou.blogspot.com/2022/09/dr-grace-s-h-chou.html

In 1988, when my father went back to Taiwan to challenge the blacklist, Dr. Chou gave him the courage to go. The World Federation of Taiwanese Association Conference was to be held for the first time in Taiwan then.

The World United Formosans for Independence (#WUFI) had decided that their central committee, though they were all blacklisted from returning to Taiwan, would all try and attend and apply for visas to attend.

My father chose to apply with his correct English information, but knowing he was blacklisted, for his Han character name, he chose to use the name of a well known KMT spy. He recieved a 10 year, multiple entry visa.

The other #WUFI central committee members, were all rejected from recieving a visa. My father, realized he would be the only central committee member to attend and started to feel the fear of being singled out.

Our family in the US also started to recieve calls from someone named “Moses Chang” who started to threaten my father with retribution for “lying” on his visa application. I once answered the phone and conversed with this person where he told me my dad was a criminal.

Dr. Chou told my father, “you have to go! None of us have a visa, but you have a visa! You must go” She then offered to travel with him even though she didn’t have an entry visa.

So, together, they flew to Taiwan. At the entry gate the KMT police were there to meet her, she shouted at the line of people “I am Taiwanese, I am coming home, why am I not allowed to come home” She was then dragged away.

My father, waiting at a different line was apprehensive with fear. The agent at the entry gate looked at my dad’s passport and then his terminal and asked him “you haven’t been home in a long time.” My dad answered “sóo-í gúa tńg-lâi” (so i’ve come home)

The agent looked at his terminal, looked at my dad’s passport and looked at the police who just dragged Dr Chou to a back room for a long time. Then looked at his terminal again and looked at my dad, he then approved my father’s visa to enter Taiwan.

Standard

Dr. Strong Chuang – 莊秋雄 (1/1/1939 – 8/7/2022)

The last clear sentence Strong Chuang (莊秋雄) said was “Taiwan should be an independent country.” This was moments before John Hopkins Hospital’s rapid response team came in to bring him back to life at the cost of having a second major stroke within the space of two months. The damage from the second stroke was considerable and since then, he lost much of his ability to swallow or communicate. The last words he said was “it’s OK”.
Dr. Chuang was the first among his family to immigrate to the United States. He was born in Tainan, Taiwan and raised by his mom, 5 sisters and brother where they suffered post-WWII poverty. Their poverty forced him to drop out of school to work odd jobs to help support the family. He still managed to get a scholarship to a local private school. Through these educational opportunities, he was able to eventually graduate from National Taiwan University as a civil engineer and work for a few years before receiving a scholarship to Kansas State University for a Masters degree in Civil Engineering.
Once arriving at Kansas State University, he met several other overseas Taiwanese graduate students and first learned in depth about white terror and the 228 massacre in Taiwan. This affirmed many of his suspicions that there was something wrong with Taiwan’s society and he recognized the authoritarian nature of the Kuomintang government in Taiwan in the 1960s. He threw himself into the Taiwan Independence Movement willing to fight for the freedom and nationhood of the Taiwanese people. After learning Taiwan’s history, he recognized that the only way Taiwanese people could achieve their freedom was by having their own sovereign independent country.
This realization dictated his decisions for the rest of his life. Though he was able to earn a Ph. D. at Purdue University in fluid dynamics and have a successful career as a researcher designing improvements to tissue paper making technologies, his passion and dreams revolved around seeing Taiwan achieve many of the freedoms it has today. Most of his waking hours outside his professional livelihood were coming up with strategies, tactics and organizing like minded people in this struggle for Taiwan’s freedom.
Countless political prisoners who escaped Taiwan’s authoritarian regime came through his house. There were constant fundraisers, organizational potlucks and popular education actions to let the world know that Taiwan exists and had the right to be an independent nation. From the 1950’s to 1990’s, Taiwan was only known in the United States as “Free China.” His response was that Taiwan was neither free, nor was it China. Due to his activism, he and his wife were placed on the “blacklist.” This was a list set up by the Kuomintang government seeking to threaten and silence overseas Taiwanese immigrants from speaking out for the Taiwanese people’s freedoms. He was never able to return back to Taiwan after he left in 1965 up until 1988.
In 1988, Dr Chuang managed to get a visa back to Taiwan to attend the World Federation Taiwanese Association Conference. He did so by putting his correct English information on his visa application, but used a known KMT spy for his name in characters. After years of being rejected for a visa to Taiwan, he received a multiple entry visa and used that to enter Taiwan, being one of the first blacklisted dissidents able to publicly circumvent the blacklist after being a speaker at the conference representing the World United Formosans for Independence. (WUFI 臺灣獨立建國聯盟)
Throughout the 90’s, Dr Chuang continued both his passions as a successful research engineer for the private sector and an activist for Taiwan independence. As a research engineer, his patents led to a new technology for energy efficient tissue making machines named after him. As Taiwan democratized, he continued pushing people to advocate for Taiwan independence and to nurture the development of the Taiwanese identity.
Once he retired, he enjoyed his continued activism as WUFI USA chairperson and traveled back to Taiwan quite often to continue to push the Taiwanese identity in Taiwan and abroad. He spent the last few years in Baltimore, MD seeing his grandchildren grow up. Dr. Chuang is survived by his wife (Chien-mei Chuang), sisters and brother in laws (Monica Hsieh, Faren Chen, Tracy Chien, Fanghua Chuang, CP Hsieh, Roy Chien, Sheng Wu), daughter (Rolla Chng), son (Tim Chng), daughter in law (Valerie Chng-Lim), and five grandchildren. (Constance Francois, Evains Francois, Seth Chng-Lim, Sage Chng-Lim, Skye Chng-Lim)

Standard

Overseas Taiwanese Independence Movement Timeline

1947

2-28 – Taiwanese massacre

2-3 years later – Taiwan escapees established a Taiwanese provincial government in Japan (Thomas Liao)

1950
Another Taiwanese escapee organized and published Taiwanese Youth monthly started to organize younger Taiwanese independence activists.

1954
Early 1950’s (1954) Taiwanese American Students (Jay Loo, John Lin, Edward Chen, Ton-ket Young) organized 3F (Free Formosa for Formosans) in Philadelphia. In a few years 3F was reorganized as UFI (United Formosans for Independence)

1964
National Taiwan University Political Science Department Professor Peng Ming-min and two students (Hseigh Tang bin and Wei ting-chao) in Taiwan’s highly controlled society secretly established a declaration for Taiwan’s self salvation. (Also known as Taiwan’s declaration of independence) It was not successful and the three were arrested.
However, the KMT’s illegal rule of Taiwan was not only protested by overseas Taiwanese diaspora but also unbearably by Taiwanese living in Taiwan.

1965
The KMT eventually controlled Thomas Liao in Japan to surrender the Taiwan Provincial Government and he went back to Taiwan to surrender to the ROC after they imprisoned his family in Taiwan. The overseas Taiwanese movement was not affected by his surrender.

The KMT efforts to force Thomas Liao to surrender encouraged more overseas Taiwanese students to be more committed to Taiwan Independence struggles.


Dr. and Mrs. Chou organized Taiwan study group in University of Wisconsin, Madison

They organized a solidarity meeting for Taiwanese Americans in 1965. The meeting decided to form UFI to be a more effective organization for the purpose of achieve Taiwan independence. This new reorganized organizations was initiated January of 1966 and formally launched in June of 1966. The new reorganized organization was named as UFAI (United Formosans in Amerca for Independence). UFAI members kept up the struggle for Taiwan independence and were encouraged by George H Kerr’s book “Formosa Betrayed” also published in 1965. They were also inspired by the anti-Vietnam war movement on US college campuses and the Taiwanese student movement to protect Tiao-yu-tai Island against Japan. They were especially encouraged by the news of Doctor Peng Ming-min escaping from Taiwan and appearing in Sweden.

They were also inspired by the successful story of the Cuban revolution a decade ago. Cuba, like Taiwan was also an island nation that was controlled by the Bautista dictatorship in a similar manner that Chiang Kai-shek’s dictatorship controlled Taiwan. The Cuban revolution was sparked by 80 idealists who trained to be military gurillas to free Cuba after landing on the Sierra Madre Mountains. Almost all of the idealists died when they made it to the top but
rather than surrendering, they made an announcement on the top of the mountain a radio announcement that the army had arrived. UFAI members seeked to follow the same model and trained to be revolutionary guerrillas to free Taiwan from the Chiang dictatorship with similar tactics.

1966

United Formosans in America for Independence (UFAI) campus center grassroots revolution

UFAI was the first grassroots overseas Taiwanese indendence organization dedicated for revolutionary change for Taiwan. They were motivated by three basic principles:

  1. Promote Taiwan Independence ideology (Strong Chuang)
  2. Take effective action (Tom Yang)
  3. Grow strong organizations (Trong Chai)

In June, 1966 at Independence, MO was the first UFAI meeting. It was decided there that they would meet every two years.

1967
Francis Tiu (Chong kui hen became a full time revolutionary to fight for Taiwan Independence. He currently resides in Sweden

1969
Summer UFAI meeting in Hammond, IN

1970
In April, UFAI member Peter Huang performed an assassination attempt on Chiang Ching Kuo who was head of the secret police in Taiwan. A UFAI member in Louisiana bought the hand gun.

In NYC several Taiwanese women chained themselves at the United Nations demanding human rights in Taiwan

In December, the World United Formosans for Independence (WUFI) was officially created in New York city

1971

In January, WUFI announced their declaration to struggle for Taiwan Independence. Possible attendees George Chang, Trong chai, lo hok-tsuan, Kyu bun ki, Strong Chuang, Wang po-wen.
It was decided at that meeting to publish monthly newsletter named “Taiwan Independence”

In June, WUFI organized their first secret meeting at Dennison University with roughly 90 people in attendance.
Two people Clyde Kiang and Mr Tseng were unable to attend by not decyphering the secret code.

In Williamsport – little league world championship organized by Cary Hung, George Chang and Wang po-wen hired a plane to send a message back to Taiwan trailing the plane message. Afterwards in the parking lot, KMT military thugs assaulted the Taiwan supporters.

1972

Summer at Gary, IN – little league world championship where there were verbal confrontations between the Taiwan independence supporters and KMT supporters.

WUFI had a propoganda campaign to send clandestine Taiwan Independence messages to Taiwan from 1971 to 1975. The Taiwan Independence symbol was the Triangle over the Circle.


1975

Ong hiam lan sent three mail bombs to the Governor of the ROC, Chiang ching kuo’s (Secret police head) left hand man and right hand man.

TAA and regional conferences

1979

Kaohsiung incident

DC support for WUFI support political prisoners
FAHR

1980

Taiwan Tribune started to be published and circulated among the Taiwan Independence supporters

1988

Standard

[中英版] An Open Letter to the Taiwanese American Community: Securing Taiwan’s Democracy 給台美人的一封公開信:守護台灣民主

POSTED ON SATURDAY, AUGUST 22ND, 2020 AT 8:22 AM.

WRITTEN BY GUEST CONTRIBUTOR

An Open Letter to the Taiwanese American Community: Securing Taiwan’s Democracy

給台美人的一封公開信:守護台灣民主

A strong United States is crucial for a more secure and democratic Taiwan. Contrary to popular perception among the first generation in the Taiwanese American community, the Trump administration has weakened the United States’ economic, diplomatic, and moral standing in the world. This is detrimental to Taiwan’s long-term security and democracy. The authoritarian government of China continues to threaten military intervention, claim sovereignty over democratic Taiwan, and expand China’s military and economic power throughout the Asia Pacific region.

一個強大的美國對提升台灣的安全及民主是至為關鍵重要的。相對於第一代台美人甚為盛行的想法,我們認為川普政府已經弱化美國在全球的經濟、外交及道德地位,連帶嚴重影響台灣的安全及民主,讓中國極權政府持續對民主的台灣進行武力威脅並宣稱擁有主權,擴張中國在亞太地區的軍事及經濟影響力。

The November 2020 election is the Taiwanese American community’s opportunity to vote Trump out of office, and support the election of former Vice President Joseph Biden and Senator Kamala Harris. The Biden-Harris administration will take actions to strengthen the U.S.’s relationships with our allies rather than continue our unilateralism.

今(2020)年11月美國總統大選中,台美人有機會用選票阻止讓川普連任,並支持前副總統拜登及參議員賀錦麗,我們相信拜登-賀錦麗的政府能採取行動重新強化美國與友邦的關係,而非持續讓美國走向獨斷獨行的單邊主義之路。

Trump has weakened the United States in the following ways:

由以下幾點說明川普如何讓美國地位低落:

1. Trump has weakened the U.S.’s diplomatic and military standing with our allies and gutted the State Department’s ability to act through budget cuts and the loss of senior diplomats. An ill-resourced State Department is one that will be unprepared to respond to pressing global issues, including China’s role in international organizations in interpreting and rewriting rules to exclude Taiwan.

川普已經讓美國的外交及軍事地位在我們盟邦中一落千丈,而其大砍預算不僅削減國務院的組織,更讓稱職的資深外交人員接連去職。一個資源匱乏的國務院無法做好充分準備,以因應迫切的全球議題,包括中國正在無所不用其極地重新詮釋及改寫國際組織規範,以排除台灣為目的之嚴重情事。

2. Trump has weakened the U.S.’s moral authority by not explicitly condemning the Chinese government’s interference in Hong Kong and the subjugation of the Uyghur population. The weakened State Department has been unable to coordinate a multilateral response to the National Security Law, which has imposed “White Terror” in Hong Kong. What is happening in Hong Kong casts a long shadow over Taiwan’s security and democracy.

川普未能明確譴責中國政府干預香港民主及鎮壓維吾爾族人,已經嚴重弱化美國的道德威信,資源匱乏的國務院造成美國無法統籌協調出全球一致性針對香港國家安全法的因應措施,讓香港陷於白色恐怖之中,而今日在香港發生的情事將導致台灣安全及民主壟罩在長遠的陰影威脅之中。

3. Trump has failed to respond adequately to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Trump administration’s lack of a coordinated plan, to quarantine, test, and contain the masses of U.S. citizens returning from infected countries, has made the U.S. the most infected country in the world. This has exacerbated the virus’ spread, weakened the U.S. economy, and led nations around the world to lose faith in the United States as a working partner.

川普在對抗新冠肺炎的反應措施上完全失職。川普政府嚴重缺乏隔離、檢測、及如何處理從疫情嚴重國家返美的大批國人之因應計劃,使美國成為全球疫情最嚴重的國家,不僅加速病毒的傳播,重創美國經濟,更讓全球各國對美國為合作夥伴的信念失去信心。

Under the Trump administration, the United States is weaker, not stronger. The security of Taiwan and the Asia Pacific region is based on the principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution: democracy for all. Trump’s actions to isolate and weaken the United States will only endanger the entire Asia Pacific region to China’s attempts at expansionism. To strengthen the United States, secure Taiwan’s democracy for future generations, and protect Taiwan’s security, we must vote Trump out of office in November.

在川普政府主政之下,美國沒有更強大,而是變得更贏弱,台灣及亞太地區的安全保障是基於美國憲法所彰顯「全民民主」的價值原則。反之,川普採取的政策不僅孤立及削弱美國國力,更讓整個亞太地區陷於中國擴張主義的威脅之中。為了未來世代,我們必須強化美國、守護台灣民主及保衛台灣安全,因此我們必須要今年11月用選票將川普送出白宮。

Signed,

Taiwanese Americans United

Tim Chng 莊騰程 – moderator, co-founder of Intercollegiate Taiwanese American Students Association (ITASA)

Jennifer Lai 賴瑀琤 – moderator, civil rights lawyer

Joann Lo 羅怡婷 – moderator, co-founder of North American Taiwanese Women’s Association II (NATWA II)*

聯署成員

台美聯合陣線 (TAU)以下成員

莊騰程,  台美大專學生會發起人, TAU管理員

賴瑀琤, 人權律師, TAU管理員

羅怡婷, 第二代北美台灣婦女會, TAU管理員

Standard

Trump’s failed leadership during COVID-19

When assessing Trump’s failed leadership with regard to COVID-19, the worse decision he made was his European travel ban without a containment or testing plan to repatriate US citizens from Europe who were returning from heavily infected regions.
 
The indoor crowds at airport terminals and customs on March 15, 2020. (Two and a half months in to this pandemic!) demonstrated a complete lack of understanding or concern for the safety of US citizens from the spread of COVID-19.
 
Before this failed decision, the US had a chance to keep COVID-19 contained outside the United States. After this massive spread of the virus through these airports and customs, we became the most infected nation in the world.
airport2020
Standard

Killing a rat

(Originally published January 18, 2008)

Being born and raised in the sheltered Cincinnati suburbs, killing animals was just not a part of my lifestyle.  When my family was to eat meat, it was to come in sealed packages from the supermarket.  So when I traveled to Chiapas, Mexico as a 29 year old man, while staying at a Mexican indigenous cooperative, I volunteered to kill the chicken that we were to eat.  The indigenous woman would hold the chicken at its legs completely immobilizing the bird and I grabbed its neck and twisted it.  After twisting a few times, I wasn’t sure if I killed it so I let it go.  The head twisted back and in shock, I realized the chicken wasn’t dead. My cousin was traveling with me.  She, being a Taiwanese farm girl, was horrified accusing me in Taiwanese that I was torturing the poor bird.  Upon my second try, I twisted the neck without hesitation thus finishing the bird off.  After the bird flapped its wings in shock a bit, it was dead and I plucked the feathers from the bird making it look like supermarket chickens.

Now, fast forward to today. As a 36 year old man, living in Baltimore city, rats are a problem.  While living in our house, rats that have come to visit our homes have managed to open the zipper to my back pack to eat snacks from my back pack.  For a while, I tried the Rat Zapper which successfully kills many mice, but a rat once tripped the trap and managed to escape. The rats NEVER would enter the Rat Zapper again.  I also had bought a “humane” rat trap which would trap the rat in a metal cage.

Well, this morning, I got a call from my sister who lives a few blocks away telling me that my “humane” rat trap had caught a rat and she wanted to know what to do with the rodent.  Well, we discussed setting it free, but Val (my wife) insisted it had to be killed.  Of course, neither Val or Rolla (my sister) wanted to do this killing so I volunteered to do the deed.

In 1997, on my visit to Taiwan, I went to the mountains around Puli (Nantou) and hung out with the Atayal indigenous.  In Taiwanese history, there was a famous Atayal chief named Mona Rudao (Seediq Bale) who led a rebellion against the Japanese to the point of killing the Emperor of Japan’s nephew.  The primary weapon for their rebellion was their machete which they used to chop heads.  Their religion was wrapped around head hunting.  Of course like almost all indigenous rebellions, the story ends in sadness and tragedy, but I was enthralled by the story.  With the help of cousins and helpful Taiwanese indigenous friends, I managed to smuggle out one of the Atayal machete’s out of Taiwan to the US.  The sword/machete is of the same design as Mona Rudao’s tribe.  So, how are we to kill this rat?

For the past 10 years, I have kept this head hunting machete wherever I lived with no other use than cutting watermelons. So here is this rat in a cage waiting to be disposed of. I decided to put it to use.

For the past 4 years, I have read a lot of texts on buddhism and taoism and accept much of their teachings.  Of course one of their teachings involves not to kill any living being. Yet what to do about rodents? They bring disease and disrupt your living space.  After talking to a spiritual friend of ours, she shared the thought that if a rodent enters your living space, it is asking to be exterminated.  So, we should set them free from the bonds of this life.

All these thoughts go through my head as I walk to my sister’s house this morning to kill the rat.  Upon reaching the house, I see that the rat has defecated and was screeching in fear.  I am sure it sensed its encroaching death and had the fear of death.

We put the cage in the back of the house and I was hoping to find a way to knock it unconscious through the metal wires.  Of course a rat moves FAST.  First try of course totally missed while at point blank range with the wooden portion of my machete’s sheathe.

We then set up the rectangular cage vertical leaving the rat little room to move and again I missed since the rat jumped up and clung to the wire cage.  We then set up disposable chopsticks through the wires caging it down in to a small space.  Again I tried to stab through the cage.  I HIT the rat, yet like the chicken, I was not able to strike with conviction.  I let it free while striking the rat somewhere in the stomach area.  I saw a little blood at the tip of my machete and again felt bad that I was such an incompetent executioner.  The rat was definitely showing fear as I looked at it in the eyes.  I told the rat in my mind, calm down, let me set you free and made my strike.  At that moment, my machete struck the rat’s neck where I pinned it down to the ground. Though it’s head was not separated from its body, I knew that I had broke its neck and my machete had cut deep.

I killed the rat.

Standard

ITASA – the Intercollegiate Taiwanese American Students Association

Originally published in the Taiwan Tribune in 1994

Mission Statement:

The Intercollegiate Taiwanese American Students Association is a network of college students who come together based on a common Taiwanese heritage to provide a support group, to facilitate the defining of an individual’s Taiwanese American identity, and to actively afford an opportunity to address issues and concerns of Taiwan and Taiwanese Americans.

The 2nd Generation Taiwanese American Youth Movement: The Formation of ITASA

by

Tim Chuang (now Tim Chng) – Chicago, IL

Ula Hwang – New York, NY

Cindy Yeh – Washington D.C.

A vision is created

Once upon a time, during the 1990 Taiwanese American conference / East Coast summer conference (TAC/EC) at Cornell University, a number of concerned collegiate Taiwanese Americans gathered in the lounges of Mary Donlon Hall to discuss the future of their community into the night.  They discussed many questions about Taiwan, the role of Taiwan in their lives, and what exactly it meant to be Taiwanese American.  The questioning led to talk on their future role in organizations such as the Taiwanese Association of America (TAA) and what would become of the Taiwanese American community as they became adults.  After much debate, a vision for the immediate future was created — a vision of a network of Taiwanese American collegiate students.  The individuals present at this meeting were thought of as “seeds”, seeds that would return to their respective campuses to grow and spread the knowledge about their identity and their Taiwanese heritage.  By maintaining the friendships made at the various Taiwanese American conferences, these individuals hoped to take a more assertive role toward their identity.

Meanwhile in the midwestern region, the Taiwanese American foundation (TAF) 1990 Summer Camp also addressed the conspicuous void of an organized youth movement by introducing a college program.  This program, organized by Bob Lin (Dallas, Texas) also provided an impetus for Taiwanese American college students to take action on their campuses.

Separate collegiate efforts

Throughout the 1990-1991 school year, many Taiwanese Americans clubs were founded all over the Midwest and the East Coast.  Efforts at communication among these new Taiwanese American student groups laid the foundations of a larger Taiwanese American student network.  The Midwest region was led by members of the Purdue Taiwanese Students Association (PTSA), directed by Tim Chuang/Chng (Purdue University), and the Taiwanese American Students Club (TASC) at the University of Illinois, founded by Rolla Chuang/Chng (University of Illinois).  These two clubs worked together to sponsor one of the first intercollegiate activities in inviting Columbus Leo (Leo Yeh-Seh) to speak about his experience as a political prisoner in Taiwan.

Meanwhile, on the East Coast, Winston Yang (Columbia University), Peilan Chiu (University of Pennsylvania), and Ula Hwang/Cindy Yeh (Yale University) brought members of their respective Taiwanese American clubs as well as other students to the Columbia campus in hopes of also motivating Taiwanese Americans to action.  Students from Amherst, Barnard, Smith, U Penn, and Yale attended this gathering.

One of the few bridges between the Midwest and the East Coast was a newsletter entitled “Ilha Formosa”, which was established that year by Tim Chuang/Chng.  With a circulation of approximately 1000 individuals across America, the newsletter had a clear focus on Taiwanese Americans, and it hoped to communicate concerns that they all had to face as people of color living in the United States.

Tying it together: summer networking

Again, the summer conferences of 1991 came, and again, strides toward solidifying a Taiwanese American student network were made. Tim Chuang/Chng acted as a link between the summer conferences, traveling to 6 conferences in all as a part of a new internship at the Asia Resource Center. The purpose of this internship, which was funded by the Taiwan Foundation and other generous individuals, was to promote the idea of networking among Taiwanese Americans.  At these conferences, Tim either held workshops or helped organize the youth programs.

Meanwhile, at the 1991 TAC/EC conference, Ula Hwang (Yale University) proposed that an intercollegiate students conference be organized : This gathering would be structured much like TAC/EC conferences and be comprised of workshops, lectures, and social activities.  Commitments were made by the Taiwanese students clubs at the University of Pennsylvania and Yale University to cohost the first East Coast conference to be held in Philadelphia.  The confidence to overcome the anxieties over this groundbreaking conference was provided by the guaranteed support of TAC/EC, The Chen Wen Chen Memorial Fund, and many private donors.  The organizers at U. Penn and Yale University decided to call their conference ITSA (the Intercollegiate Taiwanese Students Association).

The first intercollegiate conferences: ITSA and TAScon

In January, 1992, over 200 Taiwanese American collegians from across the Midwest and the East Coast attended the first conference which outreached to the Taiwanese American collegiate community.  Under the direction of Peilan Chiu and Morris Tsai, the conference’s theme was “Who are you?”, and it focused on understanding the essence of the Taiwanese American identity. Speakers discussed a series of topics regarding Taiwan’s political future.

ITSA Organizers at University of Pennsylvania

Ula Hwang, Morris Tsai, Peilan Chiu, Cindy Yeh

Then in March, 1992, Rolla Chuang/Chng, aided by Felicia Lin and others at the University of Illinois, convened another conference called Taiwanese American Students Conference (TAScon) at the University of Illinois.  Representatives from Purdue, Michigan’s newly started Taiwanese American Students for Awareness (TASA), and several other schools attended.

Improving on the foundations : ITASA’s new look

At the conclusion of the 1991-1992 school year, students from various Midwest and East Coast colleges met at the University of Pennsylvania for a meeting about the future of these Taiwanese American collegiate conferences.  At this meeting, the participants decided to rename the organization the Intercollegiate Taiwanese American Students Association (ITASA).  This new name more accurately reflects the nature of the organization as not only being Taiwanese, but also American.

During the summer of 1992, Stephen Chen (Emory University) took over Tim Chuang/Chng’s summer internship.  Stephen’s activism helped spread the word about ITASA to the various conferences, this time also including the South Eastern Taiwanese American community. Together, Tim and Stephen worked at these summer conferences in hopes of carrying on the vision.

At TAC/EC 1992 at the University of Massachusetts, more steps were taken toward formalizing ITASA’s structure.  Officers were chosen for ITASA, and/it was decided that the newsletter “Ilha Formosa” would be discontinued in favor of starting a joint newsletter called the “ITASA Tribune”

1992-3 : the wellspring of ITASA activity

The 1992-3 school year witnessed a burst of enthusiasm and commitment by Taiwanese American students in several regions of North America. In the fall of 1992.  Students at the University of Illinois and Brown University each sponsored a Taiwanese Cultural conferences at their respective schools.  Felicia Lin led the efforts at the University of Illinois, and Sabrina Su spearheaded the conference organizing at Brown University. Both conferences achieved their objective of presenting the cultural aspects of Taiwan, through the use of lectures, hands-on workshops, and performances.  These conferences further helped to publicize ITASA’s existence to students.

In January of 1993, Yale University presented the Second ITASA/East Coast conference which attracted over 350 students from schools across the Midwest, East Coast, the South, and even Canada.  The main organizers of this conference were Janice Cheng, Ula Hwang, Judy Lin, and Cindy Yeh.  In addition to the numerous lectures and workshops, the highlight of the conference was a panel discussion concerning Independence or Unification of Taiwan with Mainland.

Also that spring, the ITASA/Midwest conference was held at Purdue University. Tim Chuang/Chng and Lynn Lue led the efforts there and presented a conference featuring Ramsey Clark (former attorney general under President Lyndon B. Johnson) as the keynote speaker.

The ITASA activism sparked our Canadian neighbors, under the leadership of Euger Lin and Patrick Leu, into holding the ITASA/Canada conference at the University of Western Ontario. This conference represented one of the first organized displays of activism toward their Taiwanese identity by Taiwanese Canadian students.

The most recent activity which ITASA has sponsored was a cultural conference at the University of Michigan.  Held in October, 1993, this conference was a rousing success highlighted by a Taiwan Night Celebration.  The Taiwan Night performances as well as the other events clearly focused on the Taiwanese American experience with a look to the future.

1993 ITASA leadership retreat

Back – Rolla Chng, Ula Hwang, Morris Tsai, Felicia Lin, Alvin Wang, Stephen Chen, Tim Chng, Joyce Chen Hsueh Front – Janice Cheng Lim, Sabrina Su, Neill Tseng, Erica Cheng Lee, Cindy Yeh

Throughout it all, the key tool in maintaining communication in the ITASA network was Electronic mail.  Taiwanese Americans transmitted messages and articles, and the core organizers held weekly conference meetings over Internet Relay Chat (IRC).  (For those who are interested in learning more about ITASA over e-mail, please send mail to putaiwan@sage.cc.purdue.edu).

Conclusion

The dreams created in the summer of 1990 have become a reality with the formation of ITASA. As more and more Taiwanese Americans become drawn into ITASA, the strength of this student network grows, and the prospects of an active future remain bright.

While ITASA has found strong roots primarily on the East Coast and in the Midwest, it is hoped that ITASA will expand into other regions of the country. With time, effort, and the continued support of the Taiwanese American community in the United States, ITASA will only continue to flourish and grow.

Standard

International politics in the Asian American Data Disaggregation Debate

Yesterday, I had an online discussion with Professor Oiyan Poon and Giles Li about the ongoing controversy regarding Asian American data disaggregation.  As we know, to be an “Asian” includes an extremely diverse group of peoples with a wide range of histories.  Asian Americans will not only inherit that same diversity and complex history but also add a more diverse history on the context of their immigration.  Just one small immigration sub-group like Taiwanese Americans will have a different socio economic class depending on whether their family history came to the US for graduate school after the Chinese Exclusion act was repealed or if they fled Taiwan in 1979 fearing war and coming as non-English speaking immigrants.

As the discussion progressed, I learned that the group which was most against data disaggregation were Chinese immigrants from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) who were extremely nationalistic and predominately wealthy.  Their motivation was supposedly based on their selfish concern over their interests being violated by affirmative action.

Data disaggregation would start to categorize Asian Americans in to smaller categories such as Khmer, Hmong, Vietnamese, Japanese, Filipino, Samoan, Hawaiian, Korean, etc. This would allow for immigrant groups who suffered more economic disadvantages to partake in the social programs designed for those who suffered these disadvantages rather than being categorized with wealthier east Asian groups.  Now why would wealthy people begrudge that?  It didn’t make sense to me.  Wealthy people from those groups don’t even partake in these programs, why would they care if others do?

Then Professor John Cheng reminded me of one more group that would get disaggregated which might offend PRC patriots.  Taiwanese Americans would be counted separately from Chinese Americans.

Ah ha!!!

As we know, the PRC is currently threatening to go to war to “recover Taiwan.”  Yet, Taiwan has a vibrant democracy voting in a female president and taking steps towards marriage equality usually unheard of in most Asian societies.  For Taiwanese Americans to be counted separately from the Chinese American demographic would affirm one more reality that the Taiwanese identity is a distinct separate identity.

This sense of Chinese nationalism may be one of the primary reasons for the resistance to data disaggregation for Asian Americans.  As we know, this kind of resistance is not reflective of reality.  As a society that supports self determination and self identity, data disaggregation of Asian Americans will let people further understand the diversity of the Asian American experience.

Let us not let pressure from another nation’s desire to conquer other territories interfere with how we in the United States execute our domestic policy.

 

Standard